Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
一是不作为与
为
论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中
先验命题,对于不作为
为性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对
合
说明。